Brussels-Tehran: Europe and the Arabs
Under this heading, the Iranian Resistance distributed a statement, a copy of which we received via e-mail. In it, the calls of the Guardian Jurist to show “synergy” and “sympathy” between the three authorities went unheeded, with the postponement of the presentation of the seventh “development” bill of confidence in the Shura Council, based on considerations for its removal. Shura Council Speaker Muhammad Baqer Qalibaf to Khamenei, and Ibrahim Raisi did not go to parliament to vote on granting confidence to Minister of Education Reza Murad Sahrawi.

The IRGC Intelligence News Agency known as “Mashreq” explained the situation that the review of the draft law of the seventh development plan in the government had been completed, but there was a development that occurred, represented by the “Most Commander” office referring the speech of the Speaker of the Shura Council related to the plan to the government, and the agency quoted the deputy Raisi's parliamentarian said that the Speaker had some reservations about the plan, while the government decided to include some items in its draft.

In an interview with Channel 1 of state television, Qalibaf directed other kicks by talking about a subversive look, and referring to a series of crises such as water, the pension fund, rising prices of commodities - especially the costly basic ones - and housing rents, currency and health, which are the crises that Raisi promised to solve upon his inauguration, and this is indicative. It is clear that the unified government is unable to find solutions, and the destruction of livelihoods with the rise in the price of the dollar by 100%.

The course of the dispute and the explosive situation in the country clearly shows the inability of the heads of the three authorities to “synergy” and “sympathy” that Khamenei called for, and there is nothing left for the opponents but conflict so that each side can defeat the other.

The goal of the Guardian Jurist in his call to the three authorities for “synergy” and “sympathy” was to limit the policy of contraction so that he could use all his powers in the face of the uprising, but instead of bridging the gaps, the situation continued as it is, which prompted him to say that the two parties look at each other Some look like equals, and each of them aims to knock the opposite party to the ground, which he described as dangerous and problematic, whether for the government or parliament.

Under the headline “The Facts of Our Society and the National Desire,” the governmental newspaper “Ebtekar,” published by the defeated movement, stated that “today’s generations are searching for true democracy, and saving it from the clutches of arrogant reformers, who think they are right,” referring to the arrival of a generation that speaks on the basis of evidence and lives according to laws. The contemporary world, which means that there is a wide gap between the mullahs' rule and the younger generations of Iranians.

The development of the crises of the rule of the Guardian Jurist is a clear sign of the blockage of channels, the lack of a language of understanding between the pillars of government, and between the mullahs’ regime and the Iranian street, the failure of Khamenei’s deflationary policy from within, the widening of the uprising line and the approach to overthrow the regime and their penetration into the depths of an indignant society.