Moderation and tolerance are the constants of the democratic alternative to the mullahs’ regimem,,, Iran and the region are between the choice of the unbridled crows of death or an alternative in the language of tolerance, peaceful coexistence and respect for neighbourhood

There are two currents in existence from eternity until the end (good and its people, and evil and its people) and there is nothing between them, and by the grace of God, blessed and exalted is that good is inevitably victorious, even if its victory is postponed until God permits, and the worst evil is that which comes from those who call themselves God’s successors on earth and no one else Just like the mullahs of Tehran to whom God Almighty’s saying applies to others (the example of those who carried the Torah and did not carry it is like a donkey carrying books, miserable is the example of the wrongdoing people), there is no difference between them, so both of them are known and disobeyed.

The basic intellectual base of the Iranian resistance is based on reading, then reforming and building. Among the readings read by the Iranian Resistance, led by the People's Mojahedin Organization, is the criticism and correction of the religious approach and thought; The beginning of these recitations was at the hands of the founders in the era of the Shah’s dictatorship, i.e. before 1979, when the mullahs were living as preachers to the sultans in a march that extended from sultan to sultan and from mullah to mullah (mullah singular mullah), where the integrity of the faith was not at the forefront of most of their concerns, but was The satisfaction of the Sultan and harnessing the belief in pleasing him and satisfying his desires are at the forefront of their priorities, violating the jurisprudential rule that says there is no obedience to a creature in disobedience to the Creator, and they have reversed that rule and persisted in their transgression, corrupting and appointing the tyrants for their tyranny, indifferent to the distortion and corruption they inflicted on the belief in front of the common people and in front of global public opinion The result of these readings was that the defect is not in religion, but rather in those who exploited religion to serve their ambitions, satisfy the whims of the sultans, perpetuate their oppression and tyranny, and burdened the people with the tax of the mullah and the sultan’s oppression over successive authoritarian eras in which the shepherd destroyed the subjects and the religion and placed it in the hands of the pretenders and the framework of falsehood and deception to tame the subjects and make them subordinate. unconsciously obedient, and thus became a weapon to fight the Mullah and the Sultan and save religion and society from them, when the Sultan was forcing women to uncover and abandon Regarding the hijab, the mullah used to call him the guardian of blessings and strengthen his authority, while the simple people clung to their dignity and chastity.

What we would like to emphasize here is that the process of rejecting the behavior and approach of the vast majority of the mullahs existed before the revolution, and therefore their complete rejection after the revolution was not an emotional or superficial matter, but rather according to the vision of two schools, the first adopting (deception, falsehood, pretending, and violence) to achieve its goals, and the second I read I browsed the sides History and facts, and I searched and found the truth prominent, shining, bright, and strong. It does not tolerate deception nor myths woven for the sake of heresies and lusts in the fleeting world. So I followed it as a path to be guided and enlightened by it. Hence, this school had moral values expressing the reality of Islam in its society and in its cosmic surroundings, with steadfastness on the pillars and statutes that indicate the sincerity and perfection of the faith. Among themselves, while the school of extremism and extremism finds this an important way to stir up strife, conflicts, and wars between brothers in the same doctrinal community.

characteristic of the two schools

While the school of moderation overcame the spirit of humanity over its approach, making its entity an umbrella umbrella for all the Iranian people with all components of races, religions, sects, sects, groups and classes of Iranian society, under its values and principles and equal in rights and duties, the school of extremism and extremism has persisted in racism, oppression, oppression, suppression and persecution of all components, especially religious minorities. And sectarianism, where they are required to put pictures of symbols of the regime in their churches, temples, and places of worship, and to abide by what is imposed on their special occasions, which are generalizations that have nothing to do with Islam and tolerance. Children of small ideological minorities should put pictures of the symbols of the regime in their shrines, churches, and monasteries, for Sunni Muslims, while they are not a minority, have no mosque in Tehran, and they are not allowed to build mosques except in their areas, bearing in mind that they have the right to have mosques and mosques in Tehran and other Iranian cities., While the school of moderation represented by the People's Mojahedin Organization and the Iranian Resistance has always recognized the rights of others and their participation Their occasions are not only out of the protocols in force, as Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, the leader of the resistance and the president of the republic elected by the resistance for the transitional period, does when she sends telegrams on the occasion of the New Year and Christmas, for example, but rather out of a door

Belief in the Other and His Rights The city of Ashraf in Iraq used to hold solemn solemn ceremonies annually for its supporters and friends among the Christian brothers on the occasion of the New Year and the glorious Christmas holidays. In their honor, many Iraqi Muslims were invited to participate in this occasion. These ceremonies are still being held annually, and Mrs. Rajavi is still presenting The telegrams of congratulations are protocol, values, respect, and a manifestation of the tolerance of Islam and the advancement of Muslims, regardless of whether the other party is destined for that or not, or even if it is still continuing its appeasement approach with the mullahs of Tehran, the masters of the school of extremism and extremism.

And while the inferno of the Ukrainian-Russian war was based on the heads of civilians in Ukraine, the school of moderation supported and championed the cause of Ukraine and its afflicted people, while the West was the one who established the world and oppressed it and still is for its security and Ukraine, which means a lot to them because it is of their race, color, religion and gender, as they put it, stemming from Within them, and not as we put it, was and still is, despite all of that, keeping pace with the mullahs’ regime  The masters of the school of extremism and extremism keep pace with him and his desires within the framework of the policy of appeasement and appeasement, forgetting the hell of more than 43 years that the Iranian people and the peoples and countries of the region live through, who are not of his religion, people, or color, and therefore they are not concerned with their affairs. Its values, which it has always adhered to, sympathizes, advocates, and offers congratulations and blessings as moral principles and duties among human beings, despite its pain and wounds, as its people fall before the hell of the repressive death machine of the fascist regime in Iran, the mullahs, who are launching, issuing, and spreading death crows marching on humanity here and there, without fear or fear. deterrents.

Our hope is that the global system will regain its values and rationality.

Dr. Muhammad al-Musawi / Iraqi writer

Share

Related News

Comments

No Comments Found