The International Court of Justice issued an urgent precautionary decision on Friday, the twenty-sixth of January of this year, before considering the substance of the lawsuit filed by the State of South Africa against Israel on charges of committing the crime of genocide against the people of Gaza, after rejecting Israel’s request to dismiss the lawsuit, as it was acquitted. The court supported the articles of the Genocide Convention that the Palestinian group is protected under the convention
Summary of the decision issued by the court stating that Israel must take all measures in its power to prevent genocide against the Palestinian group in Gaza, improve the humanitarian situation and attempt to contain death and damage, and Israel must submit to the court a report within one month on what it is doing towards implementing the order..... A step on the way....
There is no comment on the decision of the esteemed court, as the decision was issued by unanimous votes of the fourteen judges who are members of the court, in addition to the temporary judge representing South Africa, and the disagreement of the Ugandan judge, the primary member of the court, with the decision with all its six items, as well as the temporary judge representing Israel, who rejected four items. From him.. It is worth noting that the judges are appointed from different countries, where Mrs. Judge President of the Court Mrs. Joan Donoghue is from the United States of America.. Mr. Judge Vice President of the Court Kirill Gevorgyan is from the State of Russia, Mr. Justice Peter Tomka is from the State of Czechoslovakia, and Mr. Judge Ronnie Abraham is French, even though he is He was born in the city of Alexandria in the Arab Republic of Egypt. He served as president of the same court during the period from 2015 to 2018. Then he was succeeded by Mr. Judge Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf from Somalia as president of the court during the period from 2018 to 2021. He is now a member of the same court.
Mr. Judge Muhammad Bennouneh from the Kingdom of Morocco, Mr. Judge Nawaf Salam from the State of Lebanon, Ms. Justice Xue Hanqin from China, in addition to judges from Germany, Japan, India, Jamaica, Uganda, Australia and Brazil. There are four women from the United States of America, China, Australia, and Uganda, and eleven male judges, all of whom have considerable experience and good reputation.
Provided that each state party to the case pending before the International Court of Justice shall appoint a special, temporary judge to represent it in the case only, provided that it does not have a permanent judge on the court among the original fifteen judges who are members of the basic composition of the court.
The State of South Africa has appointed Mr. Justice Dikjang Moseneke, former Vice-President of the Supreme Court of South Africa, who is seventy-six years old.
Israel appointed Mr. Judge Aharon Barak, the former president of the Supreme Court, who was born in Lithuania in 1936 and supported the war on Gaza, denying that it was a war of comprehensive genocide, claiming that the description of comprehensive genocide applies only to what the resistance did on October 7, 2023.
What is striking and questionable is that Ugandan Judge Julia Sibutende, who was born in Uganda in 1954, objected to the esteemed court’s decision with all its six clauses, as we will provide in detail in a continuation, for fear of defect at times and for the hope of not being bored and tired at other times.
and represented in ..
The first item: The State of Israel takes all measures that fall within its powers to prevent acts that constitute genocide against the Palestinian people of Gaza.
The second clause: The State of Israel guarantees immediately that its army will not commit genocide crimes against the Palestinians of Gaza.
Article Three: Israel takes all measures not to destroy and preserve evidence that demonstrates allegations of genocide committed against the Palestinian people of Gaza.
Article Four: Israel will take all measures that fall within its powers to prevent and punish direct and public incitement to commit genocide crimes against the Palestinians of Gaza.
Article Five: Israel will take immediate and effective measures to provide basic needs and urgently needed humanitarian assistance in order to address the unfavorable living conditions experienced by the Palestinian people of Gaza.
Article Six: Israel is obligated to submit a report to the court on the measures taken to implement its decision within one month from the date of its issuance, while the judge representing Israel objected to four of them and agreed to two of them, specifically with regard to the fourth and fifth items of the court’s decision.....
Isn't it strange? ? .. Or was she greedy and not convinced? She wanted a clear decision from the court and more hidden in its treasury, which will be explained later in due course.
On the other side of the events, the state of the Zionist entity received an American arms deal of F-15 and F-35 aircraft and Apache helicopters. The question is whether these weapons will be used in Gaza, especially since the resistance does not have an air force. Or is it for war with Iran, according to what the minister stated? Economy of the Entity Yanier Barakat: Iran is the head of the snake and must be fought. Is Iran listening and warning, and will it respond if it is fought and retaliate, or is it not yet satisfied with its strategic patience?